Skip to content

Becoming a franchisor

How to franchise a business: what the law requires

Published

Franchising a business starts with a document, an auditor, and in some states a regulator. Selling franchises is what happens after all three are in place.

The decision to franchise is a growth question. What follows it is not. It is a compliance sequence with a fixed order, and knowing the order is what stops a plan being built backwards.

What follows is a description of the obligations the federal Franchise Rule places on a franchisor, in the order they bite. It is not legal advice and it is not a service offering.

First establish whether you are already a franchisor

The three part test applies whether or not anybody intended it to. Where you grant the right to operate under your mark, exert or may exert significant control over how that business is run or provide significant assistance with it, and require a payment, the arrangement is a franchise. Franchise vs license, and what separates them sets out the test and the current payment threshold.

This comes first because a business can arrive here by accident. A successful operator licenses the name to somebody in the next city, helps them set it up, takes a monthly fee, and has created a franchise with no disclosure document behind it.

It matters in the other direction too. If what you have genuinely falls outside the test, none of the rest of this applies to you, and establishing that with counsel is cheaper than either of the ways of being wrong about it.

The disclosure document is twenty three items and you prepare it

The Rule specifies the contents. Twenty three items (opens in a new tab) in a fixed order, covering the franchisor and its principals, the fees, the estimated initial investment, what each side must do, territory, trademarks, renewal and termination, outlet counts, financial statements, and the contracts themselves as exhibits. Preparing it is the franchisor's responsibility, not the prospect's and not a regulator's.

  • Item 19, financial performance representations, is permitted rather than required. A franchisor may say nothing about financial performance, and a new system with no defensible basis for saying anything is in the strongest position when it says nothing.
  • Item 20 carries the outlet tables, which means the document reports its own attrition year by year. There is no version of it that shows only the good years.
  • Item 21 requires financial statements, audited, with a phase in available to a franchisor that has not previously had to produce them.
  • Item 23 is the receipt, which is how the disclosure date is evidenced afterwards.

Audited statements, and what they need before they can start

An audit is neither a formality nor a quick one. It needs books that can be audited, which for a business run on management accounts can mean a period of remediation before an auditor will begin fieldwork at all.

The phase in softens the first year rather than removing the requirement. A launch date set without an auditor's schedule already in hand is a date resting on an unknown, and the unknown is on the critical path rather than beside it.

Registration states come before any offer

The federal rule governs disclosure. Several states run their own franchise statutes on top of it, adding registration or filing requirements, and in those states the obligation attaches to the offer rather than to the sale.

California is the clearest one to read, because the statute says it in a single sentence: it shall be unlawful for any person to offer or sell any franchise in this state unless the offer of the franchise has been registered under this part or exempted (opens in a new tab). Offering covers advertising and soliciting, which is why a franchise recruitment site can create exposure before anybody has signed anything.

How many states have such statutes, and what each requires, is not a number this site will give. The count depends on whether registration, filing and relationship statutes are counted together, published figures disagree with each other, and the answer that matters is which states a particular plan touches. That is a question for a franchise lawyer in each of them.

The fourteen day rule sets the pace of every sale

Once the document exists, the Rule sets the timing. A prospective franchisee must receive it at least 14 calendar days (opens in a new tab) before signing a binding agreement or making any payment, and where the franchisor then unilaterally makes a material change to an agreement already disclosed, the prospect gets a further 7 calendar days with the revised version. Both periods are the franchisor's to observe and, afterwards, to evidence.

Limits

What this does not establish

This is a description of obligations under the federal Franchise Rule, with one state statute quoted as an example. It is not legal advice and it is not complete. It does not reach state relationship statutes, tax, trademark prosecution, or the commercial question of whether a particular business should franchise at all.

Craftline Brands is itself a franchisor in formation and has issued no Franchise Disclosure Document. Nothing here is an offer, and Craftline does not provide franchise development services to other companies. What Craftline does and does not claim to do is set out plainly on the about page, limits included.

More reading

Other guides in this section.

Have a question this did not answer?

No Franchise Disclosure Document has been issued, so there is nothing to apply for.

Franchise inquiry